Begin with the business outcome
Start with what the person must protect, change or deliver.
A placement is not proof. What the person changes, protects or delivers after joining is what matters.
Every search is different. These outcomes show the evidence we look for before recommending someone.
The business needed more than a traditional Business Analyst. It needed someone who could identify commercial opportunities, earn stakeholder confidence and turn emerging AI capability into useful business outcomes.
The risk was hiring for the title while missing the initiative, influence and commercial judgement the business would later need.
The original title did not describe the value the person would eventually create. The evidence was in the judgement, ownership and influence they had already demonstrated.
“Jess found someone who quickly grew beyond the original BA role and became central to building our AI and BI capability.”— Dan, CIO
A Lead Engineer resigned six months before a mandated B2B portal go-live. The deadline remained.
The team needed someone who could enter an active programme, understand the environment quickly and reduce the delivery exposure.
Speed mattered, but speed alone was not the result. The result was finding someone quickly without lowering the evidence bar.
“Jess understood the delivery pressure and found someone who could step in quickly. The contractor started within five working days and helped keep the programme on track.”— Peter, GM Technology
A New Zealand medical device company needed a Senior ERP Specialist with capability that was difficult to find locally.
The search could not be limited to people already applying for jobs in New Zealand. It required identifying someone overseas with the right ERP depth and the ability to succeed inside a complex business environment.
The business did not simply fill a difficult vacancy. It hired someone who could grow beyond the original role and take ownership of a broader domain.
The outcomes were different, but the evidence behind each recommendation followed the same principles.
Start with what the person must protect, change or deliver.
Assess what candidates have demonstrated, not only the names of previous jobs.
Test whether the person can succeed under the real pressure, ambiguity and constraints.
Strong candidates can explain what they personally decided, changed and delivered.
Not because the market contains only a few people. Because a credible shortlist should contain only people with evidence relevant to the outcome and environment.
No recruiter can promise that every hire will produce the same result. Performance also depends on leadership, onboarding, authority, resources and the environment the person enters.
Bring one critical role. We will identify the business outcome, the main exposure in the current brief and what credible candidates must already have demonstrated.
No sales presentation. No obligation.

Join 2,770 professionals reading Talent War Notes on LinkedIn for straight talk on tech hiring, delivery risk, and the expensive mistakes teams make before they show up in delivery.